Debate & Discussion at FriendZone | Join the Conversation

Summary

FriendZone | Make Friends & Chat ⋅ Active Social Fun ⋅ Chill ⋅ VC hosts open forums for members to engage in intense debates and deep-dive discussions on complex historical and geopolitical topics. This announcement highlights a community-led session focused on controversial theories and historical analysis. It serves as an invitation for members to join the voice channel to participate in long-form dialogue and exchange perspectives within the server's active social environment.

@happycactus-77 it could be different but i don’t think it would be largely different now than in 500 years from now
brightturtle-72 OP

sooo can we agree that if migh me more common for teens to have childeren cuz they are rn uk.. so it might again might me common and ideas of no marrage at all..

happycactus-77

what 😭

happycactus-77

i don’t know what you are saying

brightturtle-72 OP

like uk like kid nowadays get pregnet very young uk like u get it... what i am trying is the culture might change

brightturtle-72 OP

people wont have childer at all maybe

brightturtle-72 OP

or like woman will be more stronger men

happycactus-77

ok so what is the point you are trying to make

brightturtle-72 OP

no like will trust just agree yes or no

happycactus-77

i think culture will change but idk how it will change lol

happycactus-77

i can’t speak to how it will change

happycactus-77

idk if people will have children older or younger or not at all i can’t tell the future

brightturtle-72 OP

ya but we can tell for a matter of fact it will chage it as all ways been and always have been

@happycactus-77 idk if people will have children older or younger or not at all i can’t tell the future
brightturtle-72 OP

100%

brightturtle-72 OP

we can agree that there will be difference minor or major we dont know, but we still can tell it will change

happycactus-77

sure i agree

brightturtle-72 OP

ok so do u agree that lts say when it will chage they will be like the 2025 ya weird people

happycactus-77

maybe in some aspects i agree but idk about when it comes to marriage or s##

brightturtle-72 OP

If you mean “Was sexual activity involving girls under 15 common historically?”, the answer is yes in some societies, but it varied enormously by place, period, and social class. We shouldn't generalize it to all ancient cultures.

A few useful examples:

Classical Greece: Girls commonly married around 14–15 in Athens, usually to substantially older men. The marriage was normally the point at which sexual relations began.
Ancient Rome: The legal minimum marriage age for girls was 12. Evidence suggests many Roman women married later, particularly outside elite circles, but marriages around 12–15 were significant, especially among elites.
A demographic study of Roman inscriptions found the modal marriage age for pagan girls was 12–15, while for Christian girls it was 15–18.
Medieval Europe: It wasn't uniformly “girls married at 12.” Marriage ages varied greatly. Recent demographic research finds substantial regional and class differences, with some northern European populations marrying considerably later.

brightturtle-72 OP

well read it

happycactus-77

ya i already stated this

happycactus-77

even in all your examples the girls are at the very least pubescent or after puberty

happycactus-77

like 12+ i said was maybe more common during this time

brightturtle-72 OP

wait

happycactus-77

marrying a 6 YEAR OLD was not common at this time bro 😭😭😭

happycactus-77

even for those times marrying a 6 year old was considered pretty sick and twisted

brightturtle-72 OP

well as u said it ur self we really will really not know how old society works

brightturtle-72 OP

that do u think there was shit like atoption

brightturtle-72 OP

cuz he did not marry aisha for looks

brightturtle-72 OP

he married her to protect her as she had no one

@brightturtle-72 well as u said it ur self we really will really not know how old society works
happycactus-77

no i said we don’t know how the future works

happycactus-77

but we know how the past was

happycactus-77

even back then it was uncommon to marry a 6 year old

happycactus-77

and have s## at 9

happycactus-77

even in your own examples it shows that it was at least 12-15 as the bare minimum 😭😭

happycactus-77

never as young as 6

brightturtle-72 OP

ya lemme get it there

brightturtle-72 OP

wait

happycactus-77

i get that you are trying to say the historical context matters and that times were different back then

happycactus-77

but even with the historical context it was still twisted

happycactus-77

bc it wasn’t how it worked back then eirher

happycactus-77

that guy was just a child r##ist

brightturtle-72 OP

ok so lets frist remove the marring bs aside and we agree that was a matter of protection in fact to be protely honest i dont think in the 18 century an option to protect that making her ur wife

happycactus-77

even if you are saying he legally married her solely for protection how does that justify him r##ing her at 9

happycactus-77

😭😭

@happycactus-77 even if you are saying he legally married her solely for protection how does that justify him r##in…
brightturtle-72 OP

wait as i said... so the marring is justifued lets talk abt the rap# after this is settled

brightturtle-72 OP

so the only person u have problem is with his fact he fck a 9 year old right?

@brightturtle-72 ok so lets frist remove the marring bs aside and we agree that was a matter of protection in fact t…
happycactus-77

i also don’t agree that marrying her was the only way to protect her

happycactus-77

aisha was not an orphan

happycactus-77

she had a dad who was close friends with muhammad

happycactus-77

driving rn

The latest from FriendZone | Make Friends & Chat ⋅ Active Social Fun ⋅ Chill ⋅ VC