Justice vs. Order: Is Fairness Always Worth the Cost?

Summary

FriendZone | Make Friends ⋅ Fun Chill Active Chat ⋅ VC Social Gaming ⋅ Memes ⋅ Nitro Emojis ⋅ Anime hosts a deep community discussion on the balance between justice and social order. Members are debating whether fairness should always be the priority, even when it leads to instability or chaos. This engaging thread explores real-world examples of corruption and the ethical dilemmas of maintaining a fair society.

gentleunicorn-93 OP

What do you guys say about this.....

quickbadger-36

True justice is about fairness which in turns brings order.

quickbadger-36

Anything that is unfair isn't just

gentleunicorn-93 OP

If a completely fair decision leads to chaos, would you still support it?

quickbadger-36

And example of that is?

quickbadger-36

Give me and example,then I would see if it's truely fair

quickbadger-36

Enough to be supported

gentleunicorn-93 OP

Example is Operation Car wash...Brazil. They initiated an anti-corruption operation where political leaders were held accountable for bribery and corruption but it in turn caused economic instability in Brazil

swiftorchid-87

thats truee...even though we all should advocate for justice and fairness

swiftorchid-87

our modern world does not

swiftorchid-87

support fairness

quickbadger-36

Well, yeah. They wanted fairness Nd justice I guess but that doesn't mean it wouldn't come with an issue

swiftorchid-87

its made for and by people who exploit others

quickbadger-36

Especially when you try that with the very people that are in control of the power Nd laws

swiftorchid-87

if u try to give fair treatment to evryone...economical society is gonna take the hit

swiftorchid-87

fs

quickbadger-36

It's like when your dad made a rule that one stays outside the house after 9pm and he does it and you want a fair system, it might cause some other issues

gentleunicorn-93 OP

Exactly....so my question is should fairness have an upper hand while doing justice or should maintenance of order be its priority

quickbadger-36

If the cost that's the risk is too bad ,I think we should just stick with the unfair

quickbadger-36

Can't have me dying all in the goal of pursing justice and fairness

gentleunicorn-93 OP

But who should decide that the risk is too bad?

quickbadger-36

:r_kermitcorner: I speak for myself

gentleunicorn-93 OP

And I was speaking for the world :pepethink2:

gentleunicorn-93 OP

Would you accept being the one treated unfairly for the sake of order?

wildtemple-26

Yes if it fair and I'm being guilty

quickbadger-36

Hell nah

quickbadger-36

I would rather be the unfair one

grandquiver-69

Does fairness mean equality or not

quickbadger-36

Not always

grandquiver-69

Or like equity I mean

merryumber-25

The topic treats fairness and maintaining order as mutually exclusive, which may not be the case always

merryumber-25

Ideally to obtain justice is too satisfy all the right causes and intents, which is quite difficult to conceptually practice and execute

quickbadger-36

It depends on where you want to apply it

quickbadger-36

Something can be just,fair Nd equal and still not good for everyone

wildtemple-26

I think fairness is relative

The latest from FriendZone | Make Friends ⋅ Fun Chill Active Chat ⋅ VC Social Gaming ⋅ Memes ⋅ Nitro Emojis ⋅ Anime