Should We Care About Billionaires? | FriendZone Debate
- Share this discussion
- Copy link
- Share on X (Twitter)
Summary
The FriendZone | Make Friends & Chat ⋅ Active Social Fun ⋅ Chill ⋅ VC community is currently engaged in a spirited debate regarding the ethics of wealth and public indifference toward billionaires. This thread explores the tension between social class perceptions and individual human value. It highlights the importance of constructive discourse within our server as members challenge each other's viewpoints on systemic issues and personal accountability.

Ma brain hurts already
Idk the royal family just has absolute power and control, being rich helps with it but even if they gave to charity it doesn't make them exactly good u know?
Fr same lol
I think being rich usually connects with nepotism as well, with the fact that they gave a lot of positions in various things to relatives who aren't qualified or don't have the experience to run them
Yeah that's why we see actions and when we see what saudi arabia has done in the last 60 years we see nothing but good sure there was some mistakes like helping the war in afghanistan but even that war was for a good cause what made it bad is the cause changed
Ok so since it is ur own country I get that u see a lot of their actions as good but this generally is smth many people outside the country would extremely disagree with, a lot of what they did and even are doing rn isn't seen as good
Hii
That's why i want proof of that bc as far as anyone can see at the last 60 years saudi arabia did nothing but good mistakes happen i agree but actions proof good
Hi??
Nice to meet you guy's
Welcome to server
Thank you
Np
'mistakes' leading to thousands of even more having to suffer the consequences of their actions which were done for a 'good cause', Yemen's civilians population dislike them for one
Hello, welcome
I think you are talking about serious topic
Even i don't the. Topic
Just guessing from the vibe
Thank you its nice to meet you
Nice to meet you too
Yeah this is hot takes, we debate different topics like the one mentioned in the title
Ohhh
Nice
Oh so i think if we all have one life
And life is precious fr everyon whether the person is rish or poor
The pain every person feels same when you are dying
When the person dyes they don't remember how much they're rish
They just realize how precious their life was
That's why it's called a mistake it was for a good cause and them intending good cause in the first place means they actually wanted to do good until the taliban came and took over and ofc yemen people would hate us they have propaganda in the streets saying death to america death to al saud the royal familya i have a yemeni who want to yemen and took a picture in front of their house and it was filled with propaganda and the fact stands saudi arabia never attacks first


Why lol 😭 
I thought topics is
Which is mentioned
Not about countrys
Just guessing from the text
Yeah but why the 

Awesome emojis
Anyway alif
Ill go sleep you go explore the server
Laeve i am going to sleep
Me too bro
Alr
Bye-bye
Bye
These aren't 'mistakes' and I feel like can't be called that when more than a few people's lives are stopped and also those r just two examples, Saudi has also funded/ more specifically financed a lot of stuff in Pakistan and they even have that trilateral defence agreement with them and turkiye with their main thing to give being money
And I don't get how being against the countries who bombed their country a bunch is propaganda, they're the ones on the ground who have to go through the decisions of the rich leaders
And btw Saudi Arabia was the country that led the coalition for intervening in yemen
Im in bed but ill respond to lol so reducing complex geopolitics and national defense decisions to emotional talking points ignores how state security and counterterrorism actually work
Saudi defense partnerships and strategic financing whether with Pakistan Türkiye or during historical conflicts like Afghanistan have always been driven by clear national security interests and regional stability Supporting military cooperation and counterterrorism initiatives is standard practice for any sovereign state seeking to maintain a balance of power contain militant groups and protect its borders from spillover violence During major regional crises state choices are aimed at preventing total collapse and suppressing terror networks that threaten millions of innocent civilians across the Middle East and Asia
Labeling state defense strategy as propaganda or simple financial giveaways overlooks basic geopolitical reality Sovereign nations invest in intelligence and defense alliances not to harm civilians but to secure long term stability and counter real security threats in a volatile region
Regarding Yemen viewing military intervention solely through a critical lens misses the vital context of international law and regional security Saudi Arabia led the Arab Coalition in Yemen in 2015 following an official request from the internationally recognized Yemeni government under UN Resolution 2216 The primary objective was to restore legitimate governance secure shared borders and prevent a hostile non state militia armed with heavy weaponry and ballistic missiles from taking control of a strategically vital maritime corridor like the Bab el Mandeb Strait
No sovereign state can allow an armed militia backed by foreign powers to establish a destabilizing presence directly on its border Neighboring nations have a fundamental duty to defend their national sovereignty protect regional trade routes and support legitimate governance against violent overthrow
This ain't emotional points btw, they're facts and some stuff based on whoever is going through it
And i based facts in my argument
Can i sleep now plz??
🥹
Sleep 😴
Did u just write all that
Alr lol
I wrote it before this ngl bc i knew you would come back 😭