¿Está estancada la física moderna? Inmersión en topología
- Compartir esta discusión
- Copiar enlace
- Compartir en X (Twitter)
Resumen
En FriendZone, nuestra comunidad explora temas complejos más allá de los juegos. Este anuncio inicia un debate sobre las limitaciones de los modelos cosmológicos actuales, cuestionando por qué la física convencional evita topologías más ricas como S3 o S4. Desafía la dependencia del espacio plano R3,1 y explora cómo estructuras topológicas no lineales podrían resolver el estancamiento científico actual.
Si tú lo dices entonces
A continuación, el Modelo Estándar es básicamente como la ecuación unificada para la física de partículas. Intenta llevar todas las formas de partículas fundamentales, sus interacciones / fuerzas a una sola ecuación. Usa 'grupos' específicos. Puedes pensarlos como acciones que preservan las simetrías de las partículas y su libertad. Similar a cómo los nudos se preservan en un hilo cuando no puedes romperlo, [Lo siento, no puedo simplificarlo más por ahora], o como cuántas rotaciones son posibles en 3D, etc. Estos son grupos complejos y exóticos que tienen propiedades interesantes. Esto surge matemáticamente del universo. Ahora, si el universo está gritando grupos y simetrías complejas a nivel subatómico, ¿por qué no más arriba?
por cierto, sigo leyendo e intentando ordenar mis pensamientos
So, let us say you start to model the universe as a topologically rich environment. Naturally, you then allow particles to exist as embedded within the universe [solitons, like the knots in the thread].[A lot of theories that are not mainstream start exactly like this, like Skyrme, Hopf, etc]
But, there's a problem, not with these models, but the mathematics.
Solitons and the medium become non linear, and even non local.
Now, physicists and cosmologists do not fancy non linearity.
Linearity and linear models are predictable. It is as, if you double the input, the output is doubled, etc, thus, quite predictable, and you can easily use computers to model such equations and their solutions.
Non linearity is the opposite. Things are not predictable. Slight increase may destroy the output, increase it too much, you do not know. Non linear equations are also incredibly messy to solve, computers have a tough time dealing with them as compared to linear ones.
Non locality means being influenced by the past.
Until now, physicists model the universe as this uniform, linear, local spacetime so that it is easy to deal with equations and simulate the universe.
Say, even relativity and Einstein's gravity is non linear ! So are so many other phenomenon.
But physicists largely use linear approximations to simulate everything.
See the problem ?
BTW, non linear gravity is so complex, that when gravitational wave are produced, since they themselves bend spacetime, they also act like mass ! Thus, more waves, and so on. It becomes very complex.
Thus, physicists avoid such messy mathematics, but that is the next step that must be taken.
I couldn't understand most of it kinda 😅 mb but I do wanna learn and eventually get like you but basically from my understanding they are restrictions the universe by adding imaginary boundaries instead of viewing for it actually
Well, you understand the core problem then, that's good !
I'm no expert lol.
I know nowhere enough math to understand the new non linear theories, not even enough for the standard model yet lol.
You can go to the less nerdy ones then.
Sorry for that, I said that as you still seem to be following this one.
Beer?
Man Just BE normal
?
Whisky?
No ?
Is this considered abnormal 😅 ?
It very simple you just to choose to view it as something abnormal
And

His just dumb
Let's not call the fellow dumb, if he wishes to see this as not normal, so be it, it's not as if we need to care lol.