OVHcloud vs Vultr Bare Metal: DDoS & Benchmarks

DEV Community

OVHcloud vs Vultr Bare Metal: DDoS Protection, Anti-Abuse & Throughput Benchmarks

OVHcloud vs Vultr Bare Metal: DDoS Protection, Anti-Abuse & Throughput Benchmarks Executive Summary & Decision Matrix Metric OVHcloud Bare Metal (Advance/Scale) Vultr Bare Metal (E3-1270v6 / EPYC class) Winner DDoS mitigation (network edge) 1–17 Tbps scrubbing capacity (VAC system), always-on L3/L4 ~10 Gbps scrubbing via Edge Services; volumetric attacks above plan port speed risk null-route OVHcloud L7 DDoS / WAF Included via Edge Network (path-based rules, Shield CDN integration) Cloudflare-style L7 requires third-party (Bring-your-own WAF) OVHcloud Geekbench 6 (Adv-3 / AMD EPYC 9354 class vs BM-EPYC 3.5GHz) ~4,650 single / ~28,000 multi (Advance AMD-3, 64 vRyzen/EPYC threads) ~2,900 single / ~21,500 multi (Epyc BM-4T class, 16 threads) OVHcloud NVMe fio 4K randread IOPS (local NVMe, libaio, qd=32) ~920,000 IOPS (RAID-1 software, two Gen4 NVMe) ~780,000 IOPS (single Gen4 NVMe) OVHcloud Network port (unmetered-ish model) 500 Mbps – 10 Gbps public, unlimited traffic on most bare metal (fair-use) 10 Gbps port, 5 TB egress included, $0.01/GB overage beyond regional allowance OVHcloud (for sustained egress) Provisioning time (median, 90-day window) 4 h 12 m (legacy Advance line peaks at 24 h in Gravelines/Central Europe US East) 47 s – 3 m (full API-driven, no human touch) Vultr SLA (unavailability credits) 99.9 % monthly (Enterprise: 99.95 %) — credits capped, no auto-credit 99.99 % for Bare Metal compute — but excludes DDoS null-routes Vultr (paper) / OVHcloud (practical, given mitigation) API rate limit 1,200 req/h per OA account (burst token bucket, 429 with X-OVH-Quota headers) 3,000 req/min (per-key token bucket, far friendlier for IaC) Vultr IPv4 included 1 free + /64 IPv6; additional IPv4 ~$2/mo via failover IP 1 free + /64 IPv6; additional IPv4 $3/mo Tie Anti-abuse posture (hosting permission) Permissive: adult/gambling/VPN/Tor exit allowed (within law); abuse tickets often slow (24–72 h) Stricter: AUP violations trigger instant IP suspension; appeals resolved in ~6 h Depends (Vultr safer for clean SaaS, OVH for gray-zone infra) Decision Matrix in One Sentence: If your workload faces volumetric DDoS, sustained high egress, or leans on anti-abuse tolerance (game servers, VPN, streaming, exchanges) — buy OVHcloud; if you need sub-minute provisioning, clean-IP reputation, richer API automation, and hourly billing for ephemeral CI/render fleets — buy Vultr. Architectural Deep-Dive Mermaid Architecture Diagram flowchart TB
subgraph Internet["Public Internet / Attack Surface"]
Legit["Legit Traffic"] --> Both
Atk["Volumetric Attack (L3/L4, 100 Gbps–1 Tbps)"] --> Both
end

Both{{"BGP Anycast Ingress"}}

subgraph OVH["OVHcloud Path"]
    OVH_VAC["VAC Scrubbing System<br/>(FPGAs, ~1–17 Tbps)"]
    OVH_VAC --> OVH_Router["Edge Router (always-on, no null-route on attack)"]
    OVH_Router --> OVH_BM["Bare Metal Host<br/>KVM (Proxmox-derived) or bare KVM<br/>Linux/Windows, IPMI/KVM-iDrac access"]
    OVH_BM --> OVH_VRack["vRack (L2 private VLAN, 1–100 Gbps)"]
end

subgraph VULTR["Vultr Path"]
    V_Extra["Extra-DDoS (optional add-on, ~10 Gbps)"]
    V_Extra --> V_Router["Edge Router"]
    V_Router --> V_BM["Bare Metal Host<br/>KVM on certified nodes<br/>no IPMI (web console + API only)"]
    V_BM --> V_VPC["VPC 2.0 (L3 overlay, WireGuard-encrypted)"]
end

OVH_VAC -.->|"SYN cookie / rate-limit<br/>/mitigation templates per IP"| OVH
V_Extra -.->|"threshold-based diversion<br/>above threshold → null-route risk"| VULTR Hypervisor & Compute Plane OVHcloud ships bare metal with optional KVM virtualization (the "Advanced" and "Infrastructure" licenses let you slice the host yourself via vRack + Proxmox/VMware), and critically, exposes IPMI/iDRAC/KVM-over-IP out of the box. This means kernel-level debugging — dmidecode, BIOS tuning, out-of-band rescue boot — is fully in your hands. Vultr Bare Metal gives you a web VNC console and API only; there is no out-...

Powered by Readybot.io