Debate sobre a Taxa Rosa: Discussão no FriendZone
Resumo
O servidor FriendZone | Make Friends & Chat ⋅ Active Social Fun ⋅ Chill ⋅ VC organizou recentemente um debate comunitário animado sobre a existência da taxa rosa e a acessibilidade de produtos menstruais. Os membros trocaram diversos pontos de vista sobre responsabilidade econômica, precificação de produtos e equidade social. Esta discussão destaca a natureza ativa e opinativa da nossa comunidade, onde os membros se envolvem em conversas instigantes sobre questões do mundo real.
So..
okay, what is this op debating really
what against what
Real or not
meh. doesn't sound like something to talk about for hours,
Just a debate
Wouldnt be so long if I didnt have to repeat the same thing one hundred times.
which is?
Wouldn't be so long if i didnt have to explain the same topic over and over again
That its a marketing strategy and the reason prices increase is due to other formulas.
You stuck to one source and I found about 3
i'm questioning both of yall's sanity rn T~T
oh so cali and NYC and other things like Scotland is one source?
Ok.
if both of yall are just repeating over and over your points yall are gonna get nowhere
It's ok we r ok.
Scotland is a country, not a source.
son 💔
OFC IT'S NOT A SORCE ITS THEIR STUDY
Secondly Scotland doesnt have a pink tax.
they have free period products, not pink tax.
If you arent going to talk about this anymore ill close the post.
or you could not
some other people might take a swing
Scotland is exactly where the pink tax was officially studied and then acted on. That is the whole point. They recognized the unfair markup and made period products free to fix it. That proves the pink tax is real. If it did not exist they would not have needed to do that. And just because they now have laws against it does not mean the problem never existed. It means they found the data unfair enough to change it. That supports the argument not yours101010
Why close it
Let poeple see this
Then Scotland didnt fight it.
Scotland faced an issue that wasnt the pink tax.
Hello did you read it or
I did and pads and tampons arent apart of the pink tax.
There isnt a baseline for period products as men dont have them.
Even at the start of this everyone said period products are not the same as the pink tax.
-
he has a small point there
Period products are a core example of the pink tax. They are essential for women yet priced higher and taxed as luxury goods. That is exactly what the pink tax means. Scotland recognized this unfairness and fixed it. That proves it is real. It does not stop being the pink tax just because you say so.
You argument is so flawed. How can women be taxed higher than a gender that doesnt have it?
OMFKFKSKN😓☹️😈🖕🏿😈🚿
I can't
A pink tax is your gender being unfairly charged for a near identical product that a man has.
WHAT MAN USES TAMPONS.
Just google it atp... they're not part of pink tax. i checked.
You cannot have an identical product for something a man does not have an identical product dor.
in other words:
men no have product, how can women have costlier product with no baseline other than themselves
Exactly.
It is not about comparing to men. It is about pricing essentials as luxuries just because only women need them. That is unfair. It is not a male vs female tax. It is gendered markup on items women cannot avoid. That is exactly the pink tax. Scotland agreed and fixed it. That is proof.
Again your argument as flawed and has been proven by a simple google search.
Hey! Uhm! The pink tax does not ONLY apply to pads and tampons!
son it doesnt 😭
