Дебаты о «розовом налоге»: Обсуждение в FriendZone
Краткое содержание
На сервере FriendZone | Make Friends & Chat ⋅ Active Social Fun ⋅ Chill ⋅ VC недавно прошли оживленные дебаты о существовании «розового налога» и доступности средств гигиены. Участники обменялись мнениями об экономической ответственности, ценообразовании и социальном равенстве. Эта дискуссия подчеркивает активный и неравнодушный характер нашего сообщества, где участники ведут глубокие беседы о реальных проблемах.
Buddy
We have no choice but to buy multiple
While u guys have ur cheaper combined alternative
If someone says "I will only pay $5" and then someone says "I will buy it for $6" will you deny that? No you wont, you will accept the extra profit.
Then buy mens shampoo.
Price of these generally might cost most for 'better results', men aren't gonna need conditioner cos it's already in the product and women gotta get smth separate since it's not
How well do u think that would work
Many of them don't know that they can just buy that, and think that this stuff should be gendered by how it's marketed
You realise comparing products that have different formulas and results are exactly why it doesnt exist right?
Especially with people with different hair types
So you pay more because it has a different formula?
What works for the typical men won't work for a woman
Almost like why it gets priced higher.
There, you contradicted your whole argument.
Cus our bodies are different?
exactly.
This guy thinks he's so smart
Different and more expensive formulas cost more and price higher.
Are u high
You are a walking single brain cell.
I mean that there is a clear gendered divide in order to get women to buy things at a higher price then they'd need to for basically the same stuff
At least I have one
It needs to be the exact same and identical product for the "pink tax" to happen
The general basic stuff like for hygiene has the same ingredients so I slightly disagree on that
Both men and women also have diff hair types, curly, straight etc and it's not a gender based thing
I you say "why is the mans one higher when he has the shampoo and I have the ultra slick, super smooth, hair growth shampoo!"
Oh I wonder why.
True true
Still high aren't you
So again you disprove the pink tax.
Right that's a good point, so it does exist because you say pink tax does happen but it doesn't happen to every product which is genuinely just want pink tax is
If the price change isnt based on gender then the pink tax doesnt exist.
Yh that's what it is a lot of the time, same ingredients but diff packaging and at times fragrance which shouldn't have such differing price points
So then why are you talking about different products?
Who da hell started it
Hes a bit slow
I don't remember where this left off
That specific point I made wasn't abt the pink tax, I wasn't specific
This guy is talking about different products and how it wasnt based on gender but hair types.
So completely contradicting the pink tax altogether.
What are you on about
Why are you talking about something that isnt the subject?
I literally said, a gender label makes or cost more
Don't be an idiot
Was I talking to you?
Idk it's a large topic and mostly abt hygiene products but it adds up
Genuinely cannot tell what your username is?
That says a lot.
You aren't talking dimwit
I was responding to the other person's point
