Cicada Fair Launch: Investment Clarification

Summary

The Cicada community announced clarification regarding their Fair Launch investment process, specifically addressing contributions made after the $1.8M soft cap. This announcement confirms that all investment contributions, regardless of timing relative to the soft cap, will receive a pro-rata allocation if the fundraise is oversubscribed. This is important because it assures all participants that they will receive a portion of the investment, with excess funds being refunded, until the $18M har...

Fair Launch Clarification🚨

🔎All investment contributions after the $1.8M soft cap will be eligible to receive an allocation.
🔎Excess subscription funds is an indication of an oversubscription status for the fundraise.
🔎In the event of excess subscription funds, all participants will receive an allocation on a pro-rata basis no matter at which point you have made the investment (before or after the $1.8M cap).
🔎E.g. Total Investment = $18M, Bob invests $1,000. Because their is a 10x oversubscription: Bob will receive a $100 allocation and $900 will be refunded to him.
🔎Once the $18M Hard Cap is reached, no more investment participation will be possible. @Cicadian

29 views

The latest from Cicada

rtUSQ Yield Resumes — Retrospective Distribution

Cicada announces that rtUSQ rebase yield distribution resumes with a one-time retrospective payout tonight 20 September 2026. Eligible holders from the 14 August 2026 snapshot …

CICADA Recovery Complete Assets Restored

Cicada announces protocol recovery complete after the rtUSQ security incident. User asset migration and airdrops are finished, new CIC CICADA token contracts deployed, on-chain liquidity …

CICADA Token Migration & Redemption Update

Cicada announces a token migration after the rtUSQ incident with the snapshot fixed at block 115730532 to exclude abnormal mints. The new token will be …

CICADA Finance Security Incident Notice

In the Cicada server we announce a CICADA Finance security incident affecting the rtUSQ contract. No user funds were lost; the affected liquidity was protocol-owned. …