Petition to Cap Clans: Impact on UN
Summary
On MOON - Openfront.io this announcement explains a petition to limit clans to 500-1000 members. It outlines how the cap could break up large groups like UN, encourage splinter clans, and increase workload for UN staff. The post highlights why the policy is flawed and why the community should care.
The Petition – What is it, what does it mean, and why is it flawed
Gigantic | Important | Policy |
What is it
To break it down into its basics, the petition seeks to limit the size of clans to a maximum of 500-1000 members, citing the disparaging size between clans as a reason that so many small clans fail. The direct outcome of this (without thinking too much about it) is that UN would get broken up as they would likely bypass any member limit the Phantom’s council would propose, handicapping the clan whilst likely simply spawning several other UNs with slight variation in order to support their community, adding strain to the UN staff team.
