Debating Ethics: Community Discussion on Abortion | FriendZo
Summary
FriendZone | Make Friends & Chat ⋅ Active Social Fun ⋅ Chill ⋅ VC hosts a candid community discussion regarding the ethics of abortion. Members engage in a complex debate covering moral responsibility, societal systems, and personal perspectives on the value of life. This announcement highlights the server's role as a space for members to express diverse viewpoints on challenging social topics while maintaining an active and engaged social environment.
look i get it what u guys think abt abortion but like still its the killing of a child despite being in the womb it is killing of a child
ya.. but like get the point i arent saying its not painful but.. the fact it is the pain rlly worth killing a child whose sole mistake was to exist
and its suprising that almost all the comment abt abortion are coming from feminist who are not even pregnet
its suprising cuz i have a rlly good idea y women get abortion infact many is due to finace check it up
and does it rlly matter cuz lets assume i dont know shit abt this
can u still deny the fact that abortion is killing
does that mean a egg is not living of a chicken or any animal
Why is it a crime?
i agree with you tbh. i understand that abortion is a complicated topic, and i know there are different circumstances that people go through, but i also believe that the baby shouldn't have to pay for something they had no choice in. the baby didn't choose to be conceived, and it's not their fault that they came into existence. i believe that every life has value, even before birth. at the same time, i think we should be able to discuss this topic respectfully because we may never fully understand what someone else is going through. having compassion for the mother doesn't mean we have to ignore the life developing inside her. for me, both deserve to be treated with humanity and compassion.
There's one sane person in this discussion and that's you, cause i completely agree with you.
hit the oil rig
yutx, do you fuck around?
her spreading legs, Isn't that a good thing for men who just wanna engage casually though
exactly, So why bother. you can't change the system
yeah
Give it to me, I'll raise them
fuck them kids bro
why do you feel so inclined to defend this
yeah I get it but arguing and calling the other person satan worshipers certainly does not help
if anything you make them more reluctant to listen to you
just randomly throwing out fun facts
I hate babies
every baby sucks except mine
I love myself
Nah its chill
Already population is allat
So yea win win
Whats wrong with it..ion see any problem
we need a thanos snap
A person who’s giving birth should have the right to decide if they wanna give birth to another person or not
Snap’s effect should be selective
agreed
what should be the selection principles?
I’ll decide that when time comes✌️
hopefully im not included in that 
Would u give ur bodily resources to another person if if u dont want to..would u give any organ of urs as donation to save someone’s life..even if they force u to do it
the chances are abysmal but never zero
Ts guy knows ball
I’ve been using ts=this even before ts became this sh’t..so y’all are technically wrong
the english argument is kinda ironic tbh. english isnt the native language in france italy germany or portugal either. in countries like nigeria india and the philippines english is an official language. so assuming someone is from a so-called third world country based on their english is already a flawed assumption. using that assumption to dismiss their views is stereotyping. youre judging the person instead of engaging with what they actually said
the third world comment doesnt really help your case either. being from a developing country doesnt automatically mean someone is opposed to womens rights just as being from a developed country doesnt automatically make someone progressive and even if your assumption about their background were correct it still wouldnt prove their argument wrong. thats not how logic works
as for abortion no one is denying that women go through terrible situations. but telling someone to research why women get abortions doesnt actually answer the moral question. it explains the circumstances surrounding abortion such as r@$× poverty and medical complications but explaining why something happens isnt the same as establishing whether its morally right or wrong
bodily autonomy is important and so is the question of the moral status of a fetus. when those considerations conflict you need to explain why one should take priority over the other. highlighting womens suffering doesnt by itself settle the moral debate just as acknowledging fetal life doesnt automatically erase the struggles women face. both sides of the moral question need to be addressed if youre going to make a convincing argument
telling someone to come back after doing more research can also come across as dismissive when you havent actually engaged with their point. instead of addressing their position youre attacking their background questioning their knowledge or assuming they must be uninformed simply because they disagree with you. if your argument is strong it should stand on its own. you should be able to defend it by addressing what the other person actually says rather than relying on assumptions about who they are or where they come from
**we are charlie kirk 🦅 **
Sadly ur mom didnt have one
Honestly I get where your coming from but still it's their choice and some people don't have a choice of whether they get pregnant, life is unpredictable and scary, it shouldn't be a crime to have the choice of whether your ready to have a child or not.
But they technically aren't people
They don't even have a brain to feel pain it's basically just a cluster of cells
Is it technically murder if it isn't even a person?
Also what if the person is a teenager and the parents aren't okay with their child having a kid?
Lowkey doesn't belong in that sentence.
