Debating Ethics: Wild Community Discussions at FriendZone
- Share this discussion
- Copy link
- Share on X (Twitter)
Summary
FriendZone | Make Friends & Chat ⋅ Active Social Fun ⋅ Chill ⋅ VC is a hub for lively and unfiltered community discussions. This recent thread highlights a provocative debate regarding the ethics of the modern prison system and alternative punishment theories. It showcases the server's active environment where members engage in deep, sometimes controversial, conversations about society and justice.
i literally did
No. Where 🤯
Gone?
this
scroll a little bit down
even if it does, people are never gonna be satisfied
also it isn't a dicatorship
.
because lee kuan yew was the prime minister and there was a president hence they had a parliamentary system
And I replied this
but its kinda up for debate whether it was
replied what?????
u just deflected and moved on
But it was dictatorship
it wasn't
there was 2 branches of power
the president and the prime minister
And I actually forgot another kings or leaders name sadly who didn't want to lead but did anyway
the application of dictatorship won't work in modern society either way
in singapore?
No I did say that one already
Unless it's me 😭
gay
no offense but u would be a horrible leader
😭
wait so how does kings not ready to be in power dictate a working dictatorship?????
😭
Found it Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (Ancient Rome, 458 BCE
😭
Sad 😢 I would be slaving you first I guess 😭😭
for what crime lmao
disagreeing with u
Being so good 😊
🫶
he was in power for 15 days
😭
But it worked
btw he just solved a problem and left power
That matters
for 15 days 💔
and then he left power
Umm dictator
Duh
dictators hold their power long term, he gave up his power
plus u gave me an example for 436 BCE 😭
like the concepts of human rights existed then
im gonna refute one last argument that u have and then im gonna sleep
Who says it's upon his choice that's dictatorship
He is the supreme ruler of choices of that place
for 15 days