Deep Debates & Hot Takes: Join the FriendZone Community
Summary
FriendZone | Make Friends ⋅ Fun Chill Active Chat ⋅ VC Social Gaming ⋅ Memes ⋅ Nitro Emojis ⋅ Anime is a vibrant hub for diverse discussions. This announcement highlights a recent intense community debate regarding ethics, world politics, and justice systems. Our members frequently engage in deep, unfiltered conversations, making it the perfect place for those who enjoy active social interaction and thought-provoking discourse in a relaxed, gaming-focused environment.
ifykyk
Assaissins nowadays need to get their game up..
"We are the party of love and tolerance... If you're with us anyway"
Or better yet
"You can think whatever you want, as long as you think what we want"
Damn
Meh
They prob wont
Even if you said this and personalized it for just a joke this is a public space...
It can be used against you you know right...?
It can't, cuz I'm not a hypocrite. I don't claim to "love everyone" and then censor and persecute everyone that thinks different than me.
I straught up proudly do it.
Cuz I'm not delusional
This tho....🤏
this post aint it fam
wishing death on someone is crazy work
some people deserve it
🤣 🤣 🤣
Like who?
p3d&s, grapes t
s$rial killers, most of the world leaders and politicians
i got timed out 5 times
trynna type thiss
fuck this serverrr
"Most of the world leaders and politicians" for what crimes?
Ikr
Why tf did they put the moderation clanker here!?
starting wars for their personal benefits..letting rich business man exploit marginalised people
and many more different reasons
we are nowadays too linient with punishments
cant belive
those grapes do not get
Yk that like most of these bs is already being dealt with thanks to laws right?
death penalty
no..not in most of the countries
Yeah, but yk that would meam basically k!lling most immigrants, so some politicians don't want that
Yes, in most of the civilized country there are already laws that prevent exploitation
shpuld it matter if they are immigrants...if they do this
then they should die
To me no. Logically no. But to some politicians it does
I completely agree with you on that one
Still
they dont do it straight up...they play with laws
Do you have any proof of what you say?
well..to get resources..some people have completely ruined some countries in africa
firstly they arm rebel there
and when
they got what they want
they leave and let that country tear itself apart
cuz who cares
True
But what if instead of resources it was about eliminating a hostile government? Would you arm rebels to overthrow a gov that wants to attack you?
It's a random question
Just curious
yea but not leave them to do something worse
imo
Wdym?
many t*rror org. were started and funded by
some powerful nations of this world
and now
I asked something else though
they were also once called rebel
against the gov
and now we all know
what they are doing
But I asked something else
what?
Would you do it? And you said yes
..
But you said that you "wouldn't leave them"
and i said this
Wdym by that?
leave them without any control..without ensuring that they will not the same things against which they fought
And how would you do so?
mmm idk...cuz i dont have millions or billions with me to think bout these things and do something
but they do
and the consequences
should be thought before
doing anything
That sounds like an excuse
You said you would do something else
How would you do it?
idk
that doesnt mean there is no such thing that cannot be done
Then don't you think it's a bit hypocrite from you to judge others while not having any idea how to do it yourself?
Like?
ik what u trying to do..u got no other argument so just sticking to something that i cannot answer would help u...
i can have a opinion
dont i
Yes, but that opinion can also be shit if you don't support it with logical arguments.
I just want to know what are the other options that you say that can be used
and whats ur logic behind letting the govt do these things
If you get this defensive, well I guess I already have my answer
Well, let's remember what we're talking about
this was my main question
Now
You said you would do it too
I would too
and i said yes..i would do that
And I would do too, I agree in that
But then, why did you say you "wouldn't leave them"?
What do you think would be your next step?
Given that you gave that specific question
hmmm so i need to have a step by step plan to first arm a rebel and then disarm a rebel..
and how would i do it
to have a opinion on this
if yes
then i dont have a plan
on how to do it
So you'd just use the rebels to overthrow the gov and then stab them in the back?
letting them kill civilans and letting them disturb world peace
aint stabbing them in back
Why would you care about what another nation does with its citizens?
I'm just curious, not criticizing
cuz i dont like seeing some people who dont have anything to do with this violence dying and living in such conditions
but lowkey its alwys been like this
even before any country existed
And who do you think should have this responsability? If anyone should obv
the one who started it and had the major roles in it
if u take the glory of victory
then should also
face the consequences if something else happens
Ok but the one that stared it was the violent country that wanted to attack you and threatened to k!ll you. You just armed the rebels to tske down the violent gov without having your own men's lives at risk
So the violent country should solve its own problems, no?
well that depends on if really the country who armed the rebels really was with intention of doing such things
cuz many times that
threat is not real
and is just a false reason
to attack the other nations
Wdym? You armed the rebels so they would overthrow the violent government that attacked you
If I have a knife, and you know I have it, and every day I tell you "I'll st@b you", wouldn't you get a gun to sh*ot me before I st@b you to d€ath?
yess..but u would also not leave the gun out in open to let others kill people
True. Though in this example guns can't kill people. People kill people. But I get what you mean.
at the end...imo if u take a action..even if it was good for ur own country doesnt justify if it hurt millions others too
So why arm the rebels in the first place instead of using your own gun?
That's the thing though
Others are not your responsability
Only your citizens' lives are your priority
tactical decisions...some countries try to win without getting themselves involved in directly
thats really intelligent
but is it moral..
Why do you think that?
cuz if i am having fight with some other people..i would want to minimise my losses
If a wolf is hunting you down, would you care if you fight it fair and square or if you kill it with a trap?
Exactly. Is that moral for you? After all, you want to avoid that YOUR people might lose fathers, brothers and sons.
in this case..no
but this example
is not suited with the situation
we are talkin bout
Ok, do you think it should be different with people?
If yes, why?
cuz we are talkin bout a single attacker here
in case of a country
not all people are attackers
so if a wolf is attacking me
but his childrens are at the side
i would kill the wolf
but it doesnt mean i would kill his childrens too
this is a better suited example imo
Even if you know the children would st@rve to death without their mother?
yeaa.cuz at least they would have a chance to survive
Yeah, I wanted to get there slowly
if i kill them right and there
then they dont even have a chance
How can they survive if the one that protected and feeded them was killed by you?
Is it still as moral as you thought it was?
this maybe true for wolfs...but a country is not of a single person
and him alone doesnt feed or protect it
still why would i kill the them..they still have a chance to survive..even if its slim
Yes, that's why the term "collateral damage" exists. Because something that you didn't wanted to happen happened
No, my point isn'y about the puppies. It's about the supposed "morality" of killing the wolf to defend yourself
Even if might have ripercussions that you didn't want to happen
and i said i would
yea and i have to bear those repurcussions and try to
minimise it
Indeed. But does that mean that you would take those puppues in your own home and feed them yourself?
i never i said to do that
Taking care of them because you killed their mother in a rightful moment of self defence?
But back then you said it should be the attacker's responsability to take care of the innocents that its actions might hurt
yes.. not the responisbilty to take them home and saving them
but the responisbilty to ensure
that they dont die
of the weapons used by them
after that its not my responsibilty
Ok, but that responsability ends the moment you stop attacking after you eliminated the threat
not in the case of millions of people
Yes, because you just stop funding the rebels with weapons and money. So you assure the responsability thag they won't die of the weapons used by them
but did that really happened
NO
they stopped the funding
but still those weapons and conditions in which they left that country..its still used against the people
not saying those rebels are innocnet
or the govt of the country who threatened to stab is innocent
but if u call urself the real winner
and that u didnt do anything wrong
then its not true
and theese wars are not the only reasons those politicians should be punished
there are many others
Afghanistan, Syria and Libya r great examples of that
Some countries coming where they don't belong
And yet innocent ppl still suffer the repercussions
At this point they're getting payed to miss, like fym this guy survived 3 times already
Do you think the law prevent exploitation...
Laws are for mere citizens don't be deceived
Wealthy business men ,top politicians, underworld bosses etc still exploit but their is more secretive and organized
It has been about resources and the fear of these countries standing up for themselves. So they keep sending and arming rebels to weaken and destabilize them. If you can't break the people directly, create disunity and make them break themselves. Not to mention the benefits involved when those wars drive inflation.
None of those war and terrorists funding were of the interest of those countries
Do you think those leaders care about their our citizens talk more of another country's citizens....
It has been about resources and the fear of these countries standing up for themselves. So they keep sending and arming rebels to weaken and destabilize them. If you can't break the people directly, create disunity and make them break themselves. Not to mention the benefits involved when those wars drive inflation.
None of those war and terrorists funding were of the interest of those countries
Do you think those leaders care about their our citizens talk more of another country's citizens....
Yh that label was just to fool the public
some people think that they belong everywhere but no one belongs where they live except them
faxx
sybau
Yh exactly, hypocrites go to other nations and do wtvr yet hate when it happens to them
Free to see it that way
Bro give the sniper ive played all hitman games
But I asked you for that example
Stfu clanker
Bot
I love how we all are people that always argue with each others, but then a clanker gets in and we all unite in insulting it before going back to argue with each other
🤣 🤣 🤣
Man we all hate them equally lmao
fr
Stfu scammer bot
I hope not
Wow ur a bot
Indeed i am a bot but why would a bot be named abdullah by all names
New type of bot
Interesting
Trying to catch others out
Hi. lOOKING fOR NEW fRIENDS . GAME, CHILL, fUN, M, DM 21+
Stfu clanker
Habibi bot ig
Filthy bot
100% halal
yeahh...but am not the target
WHAT is this bro
I know I shouldn't have come back
what??
