Would Female Presidents End War? | FriendZone Debate
- Share this discussion
- Copy link
- Share on X (Twitter)
Summary
The FriendZone | Make Friends ⋅ Fun Chill Active Chat ⋅ VC Social Gaming ⋅ Memes ⋅ Nitro Emojis ⋅ Anime community recently engaged in a thought-provoking debate regarding whether female leadership would reduce global conflict. Members explored perspectives on human nature, strategy, and historical context, concluding that war is driven by ambition rather than gender. This discussion highlights the active and diverse social environment found within the FriendZone server.
If it was females presidents instead of males do you think we would not have war?

eh not really
Why
Ofc there would be war
War isn't gender specific
They would do a better job for sure with ending the wars
Wyy
Owo noodle
Maybe
I'd go with- if there were female presidents they could easily calculate every possibility in war because they overthink like the world ends tomorrow!! Lol.
I think there would still be war. Males have beef with each other and we damn know women also have beef with each other. Also just like if a man is immature, a woman can also be immature
I don’t like to make it gender specific
“Men being presidents mean wars”
“Women being presidents mean no wars at all”
They may be less wars, but it’s not gonna be no wars at all
there would be wars, but they will lose them
No. Historically female leaders have waged more wars than male leaders. Althought this is not something that is based on gender, so it's just a stupid argument
only if she is trumps child!
Lmfao
Cos humans will use violence to get what they want and it's not a gender specific thing
Many countries had female leaders..it was all same
Are you sure that it would be every possible war
Have u not seen how males handles it
I dont think they would fire bombs at eachother
Everyone is scared almost
So not possible
👁️👄👁️
Nice joke
thanks!
Depends on mindset ig
On what year
Was just a joke..
War is a game of strategy, the person who understands every possibility of what could happen and how he/she will react to that situation will become the Victor.
It does not go with the idea of being gender biased- leaders must become their enemies before facing those Enemies.....
Well many just expects it to change
Its already a disaster
Maybe
In my opinion- war will never stop...
Has nothing to do with gender.
Humans as we are with our greed, desires and ambition we would always want something else.
No matter what you want as soon as you have it you want something else--- this condition only gets fixed if peace and human life is more valuable than resources.( when presidents think harmony and human life is more precious than war and the resources it gets us- power, authority, land resources etc.)
💀
It would still be the same.
What good does it do
Sure its greed but like how it is now , it turns more into a Warzone so i feel like some females would made it more peaceful
Like if we removed trump
Put female instead
Maybe
Answering your question-
Simply Trump remains daft with his decisions.
Not just a female president but any reasonable and competent president would look to cool down the situation...
Fair enough
He wants to own places

would low-key want to see a female president trying to negotiate or talk it out when someone wants to bomb their country
some Japanese goddess?
Alright
Oh
What's USSR
Sorry I don't know about it,I only know what I need to know 
Cool
Thanks
Anyways, male president,female presidents
Doesn't matter
The whole country is run by not just a president
Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic. The totalitarian murd€ring communist nation that was born after the coup and rebellion led by shit marxist in 1917
Oh. I think I have seen the Soviet word somewhere before 
What was their goal
Let me guess
Communism?
damn
Yes. Imposing communism to the whole world because it was "for the greater good". Such a good system that not only it killed more than a hundre millions million people, but it also imploded
Huh. Those two are a bit similar though
No difference. They're both low-life parasites
It's an ideology to share resources equally by the govt but it turned into dictatorship
I see
No, that is a mix.
Lol. It doesn't matter. When you try to apply it in real world settings
It's gonna look the same
Nd not give you the results that were predicted in theory
Then correct it plz
socialism-70% communism, communism-100% communism
So what nism would be fine?

Probably individualism
If there is anything like that
Getting moneynism
Better for you or us?
Cause even if it's better for alot of people. Lol
It wouldn't please some people
this one can remove problems of democracy too..but mostly only on paper..not irl
I doubt that
Real world is a messy place
Can't please everyone
Nd everyone likes it?
Socialism is forcing the government to have full control on every aspect of life, on private citizens' lives, on jobs and on the market, telling you hwo to live, act and think. Communism is all that but coupled with extreme violence, class warfare, and more importantly the VIOLENT abolishion of every form of property to be "redistrebuted", aka being controlled by the government.
Yup
Yope. Exactly.
Feudalism rules
It's like giving everyone free food. When I sell foods
, that's gonna ruin my business
Selling water is better
Like nestle does
Random question; why brought up the need for government?
control
So people transfer their power to a set of people right?
In return for provision Nd protection
yess..its the case in every ideolegy..
on paper yea..but irl we know the reality
Hmm. But it doesn't go as expected
So u guys are thinking for a new ideology?
Without exploitation sounds great
yess make me the leader
Reality would like to disagree...
Then tell us the idea
Hmm. Did he ever find any example of this Marxism society?
Heard it first time what is it?
money will be ours
✌️
😂
exactly
That's authoritarianism, like shown in those George Orwell books
Smth new could work while using already existing ideas and mixing it with new changes
mixing would bring issues
In reality socialism is a delusional idea that has no real base in the world since so called "exploitation" (which in reality is simply paid to do a job) will always exist, no matter what. And both implies total control since they bith need to be FULLY in control to try to "achieve" (even though it's objectivelly impossible) the "real" one.
Yup but once i thought a lot and end up with nothing
So it's a dream goal
I have thought of ideas and even noted them down somewhere but can't remember it haha
Which is where socialism and communism always end up since they both NEED an authoritarian government to force their sick cult on people
Then what's the benefit of doing that 🤔 if u can't even remember
Ok
So does capitalism, then again none of those idealogies work if they need that
so you need a dictator kind of power level to do total good
Damn
Well it's fun to think abt it, what I did think is trying to restructure capitalism in a way so certain groups can focus on helping others through things like company investment (or smth like that idk)
Another day to acknowledge that not everyone wants the "common good"
So if u make anything better than current systems u can txt me i would love to see that
Like the thing with ppl complaining abt stuff through protests doesn't do much
Focusing on using the current system to ur own advantage will help to elevate u more, and then changing it to suit u and ur own ideas
A coup wouldn't do any better. I would even fear those people more
Using the current system while pushing ur own ideas on the side, tho it will take time since nothing is quick
Yup
Exactly,use the system. This is why I love capitalism 
Coups go too extreme and usually cause more harm than good if there's not a properly structured plan to do so
Nice but making that practical without corruption is the challenging part right
History showed us that it doesn't always go as planned
Use the system, and cause the change u want to change the actual system itself
this would cause accountibility issues too imo
Corruption would always exist. Because I don't see it as a bad thing when I am the one benefiting from it
😂
the people who are being benefited of that system would never allow it
Yup it's human nature btw
be it communism or capitalism or any other
You want to use a system to change that same system Nd expect the system to Just allow you lol
Good luck
Thing is someone in a good position of power would have to enforce that in certain ways in order to make it work, as for anything else

Yh exactly
I think we need to adopt something decentralised
No government
No laws
Jungle rules
Yup

Nuh that would be hell
Why?
Exactly
Which is y those who literally want a change need to move into higher positions, they have to make moves so that they can bring a change abt instead of doing nothing and theorising things
But no one to blame
Exactly
Dude is using some really tough words btw 😅
switzerland doesnt have a president..it has 7 person council..and certainly they take rational decisions
but it can cause delay in descions too
yess
That's sweet
. Imagine getting into one of the positions or the seven becomes corrupt lol
I took into account that it doesn't just allow ppl to change it, yet it's easier to make changes if u r one of those at the top or have worked towards getting there in order to make changes, it doesn't just come and manifest in front of ppl, and ik that
It would be the boys
BOYS
War will exist no matter what
It would be better in a way but not fully decentralisation
Why would anyone at the top want to change what benefits them. It's like you trying to change your job when it pays better
We can try to make something Fully decentralised
Hmm
Jungle 
GOOD PEOPLE
Survival of the fittest
but there are not many
So ur saying we should give up all the efforts we put to become human from an animal 😅
trust me even good people love benefits
I'm not talking abt those at the top rn, I mean those who r focused on making a change and that's their whole thing as they use the system in order to get to those goals that they want
Well how would that work then
Yope. Embrace nature
even these are not much left now..
Bluh
blehh
Bluh
Bloooh
That's what we need to think of
Bluh
BLUH
blyaa
Hmm. What if those people you think that wants change gets to the top Nd that change doesn't line with what you expected
Nuh it's hell
BLUHHHHH
Hmm right
Blyuhhhh
You are just weak
Well at least having ideas to how that would happen and a simple plan is a good start
yea i cant live without internet now
BLUHHHHHHH
Yup u got that 😅 everyone isn't strong by body
Yope. We already behave like animals at this point
BLUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Hmm
But you have a smart mind
WE ARE ANIMALS
just a bit advanced ones
Well u can say that I am not smart but yes I am creative
dangerous ones
survival of the fittest
So you can survive if the world goes lawless
Having straight expectations abt what ppl want to happen is just setting them up for failure, besides it isn't a one person thing and ofc some ppl will fail at what they do so they should look at diff routes and stick to their mindset instead of allowing themselves to revel in that corruption they disliked in the first place
🤓
Yup i can buy i don't want that
BLUH

BLUHHHH
Or you can kill the good ones like always 
Except for the fact that the term capitalism was created by a communist, since they needed to create am ememy first to justify their lust for power, given that so called "capitalism" is simply freedom to choose to live your life according to your desire (with obviously all the limitations that this mortal life and nature give us)
History
Bluh
Awwn
-
bluh
Yh just kill everyone, bad good wtvr and simple as that hahah

Just think of that if the world becomes lawless it will become so scary
I wouldn't agree with that
And peaceful at one point
Kill evryone but why?

That's not peaceful 😭
no human, no ideology..ahh
More resource,less people
It would be. Nature would be allowed to rest
Karl Marx? I thought he was a socialist, also capitalism is what it's been called by others who apparently follow that main ideology in other countries like in the USA
I can agree with that but whom to kill how would one decide that ? And suppose we kill u then
Uhh, idk
Yess, exactly that
Dude but few ppl wanna live even in that much chaos and who r we to decide whether they are allowed to live or not?
Yess this
lowkey..surviving after a apoclypse is fun..
maybe
😂
It's fun to watch as anime or movie story not irl
Yes irl
only one way to find out
Some ppl who don't know what we need to know 😅
So ur gonna be Thanos
thats just 50% of population
cos everyone is dumb
we need more
Eh
That's why we are yapping Instead of doing something productive 😅
This is productive to me, I'm cleaning up my debating skills
let a virus decide
Let's strike a deal Thanos
Or smth idk
You would spare me in your snap
-
bluh
💀
-
ɓĺùĥ
Damn
I will do my magic now
BLUH BLUH BLUH BLUHHHHHHHHH
BLUH BLUH BLUH MAKE A BLUH OUT OF HE'S BLUHHHHHHHHH
U can only use English cos it says in the rules
☝️🤓
Bluh
Server guide
Ok bluh bluh
Female presidents with female soldiers would be great
DON'T BLUH ME YOU BLUH
YES I WILL BLUH U, U BLUH BLUH
YOU BLUH YOU BLUH
U bluh😒
No you bluh

Bluh

son💔🥀
Police mens have a lower chance of death during war so men would be great for police men
On one letting u hit
i support this movement
and we will become stay home husbands too
Also females act on emotions most of the time so they would not try to kill females because of feminism
they do catfight
even worse than a nuclear attack
Until they send police for fighting for military
+420 female worship points

😂
Which is all what happens NATURALLY. The more you work, the more you have the right to claim as yours what you have worked for. Communism is simply a bunch of economically illitterates lusting for power that wage war against reality (hence why it will ALWAYS fail). But alas, it's useless to argue with communists so do whatever you want idc
Communism is pretty much dead now
👀
Ok guy
So u guys end up with something?
So what?
Yup sadly it is
It is actually a really intwresting fact that women have waged more wars per capita than thwir male counterparts even tho they are stereotypically displayed as 'weaker' throughout much of history
But this isnt avtually how capitalism works lmao
Like yeah itd be great if it did
But work is clearly not proporti9nal to success
Circumstance defines success more than hardwork
Also the implication capitalism is naturaal is certainly an interesting one
So now we got one more guy 😅
they were trying to create a better ideology hope u can make one
That's cos they usually feel like they gotta prove themselves more, usually within Europe with has certain ideas abt both genders
Huh
Not a sin
No ideology is natural, capitalism just slowly came for centuries
Not a sign?
What lol
Hmm
Fair makes sense
Good movie ur pfp is from
Saying its natural is quite odd like its very short sighted and propaganda-ey yknow what i mean
Yh it's a manmade thing which is literally the opposite of what natural is
I think his argument is that what u work for is what u get is like a natural thing but i would encourage him to look around at the current effects of capitalism and ask himself if thats truly how capitalism works
Ohh maybe and yh
Im not a fan of communism either but someone who hates communism so much but yet gobbles up the absolutely awful capitalist system he lives under is so funny
Like bro has the same mindset of an american citizen in 1960
Capitalism is the best and i hats those damn commies
Neither communism or capitalism are that good tbh
That's why u were thinking about new ideology right
Not completely new since I can't work in this world for that but yh
Hmm
I might just be a propagandised monkey but capitalism with significant social guardrails is imo our current best option
Wdym by that
Like capitalism but with significant social systems in place such as healthcare, welfare hell if u wanna get super woke a UBI like they have in some of the woke as european countries
Basically policies in place to stop it spiralling out of control
And eroding the democravy in which it takes place
Makes sense ig, but it's not rly gonna work imo
Some places with free healthcare like the UK's NHS haven't been doing that well even tho ppl don't need to pay, it's pretty flawed
we might have a war every 28 days lol
damn😭
🤣 🤣
Nah ur just dramatic
