Me and my team are creating and theorising new fictional element

Does objective morality exist, or do humans entirely invent right and wrong?

With the merit of substance within expression, can art ever truly be so vapid or lacking in interpretation to perception that it becomes some form of malaise or hindrance through its portrayal or expression?

I’m not very knowledgeable in science but I am curious on this.

In 2004, there was a mysterious sighting of an object that was able to move very fast, randomly (able to travel 60 miles in seconds). Other than the fact there was an object that was able to move very fast, which was captured on radar, there is not much confirmed information as to what exactly it is.
Eyewitnesses reported it being shaped like a tic tac, about the size of a Boeing 737, able to mirror other aerial objects, and that it disappeared.

Additional Info:
https://youtu.be/ygB4EZ7ggig?si=Q9UOPqEDqzKjaa8W

My inquiry is: What exactly could allow an object to perform these actions?
Also sorry if the context is too UAP/UFO based.

It is theory speaking about people creating and playing social roles just as "server leader", "car mechanic" and go on.
Because of that people are creating own vision of world that is either forced on self or others.
Expecting people to play a certain role to became accepted by others.
By "entering into role" people aren't showing self but the type of characteristics that are being accepted under the role. It works even in dating world and so for that reason people doesn't love a person but rather the role that person is playing.. as example a "doomer" or "femboy".
This is also a main reason why most of relationships are falling off since that role cannot be played all the time by us. And so our true self is showing on and the people that "felt in love with us" aren't really interested in us but in the role we have played.

What about you? Would you prefer to be rejected by majority but be accepted truly by 2 people or do you prefer to live in ilusion of be accepted by everyone?

Dramaturgy, can be defined as a perspective where the awareness and consideration of influences becomes so prevalent within a developing society that the consideration of activity and integrated productivity become too intertwined with the functionality of a sustained self to be properly interpolated without presumption.

I will be placing my laughable or personally enjoyed art projects here.

I may be petty, but I figure it warrants an acknowledgement.

Time travel, a currently high sci-fi concept, is a curious talk and balance between uncriticized dreams and the horrors of 'god-like technology and power'. While I will be open to discussion, my goal is to sagely and thoroughly leave little room for it within the duration of the explanation and expose on the topic. Further questions that are not conceptually solvable within the ramifications and structure explained will be addressed once asked within the thread, however I will not oblige a lack of conceptual progression to understand the idiosyncrasies of the topic.

"Time Travel is Murder": Very little is discussed about this specific issue when it comes to the matter of dallying with life and it's effects within reality. Often times relegated to a sidenote of "causality"/"the butterfly effect", time travel is inherently a matter of deleting a program mid computation while knowing a previous state to superimpose a new one. Setting aside the notions of 'originality and causality', any and all successes of time travel are inherently a method of poisoning the well for future generations. At the juncture where technology is inherently so incredible that one can hold power over a very dimension of perception such as time, one must recognize that any energy or matter lost from that state in the universe holds much more sway over life than what a simple peasant farmer destined to die alone would from the medieval era.

"Poisoning the Well": When such technology occurs, we must consider the ramifications of being able to interact with the very dimension of time, often referred to as "4-D" for it's 1 dimensional representation with 3 dimensionality in substance, like collapsing a wave function, it seems likely that the ability to interfere with such a substance of reality and perception is likely to acknowledge the fundamental substance of it's structure first. Further changes become cemented as a byproduct, having potential leave the immediate causal trajectory for...?

When does social understanding, infrastructure, or control become depotism.

Is there a middle ground for reasonable debate?