(To be determined for material and discussion).

Hello! Are you curious for a synopsis of the Ted Kaczynski's manifesto and what it means or is about? Look no further than this post! While I highly suggest reading his own work to understand the frame of mind and intense duress his disturbed perspective was trying to articulate his perceptions under, I will do my best to remove such historical connotations and explain the exact sentiments and observations in a summarized manner.

alright, so the egg theory is incorrect because simply based on its own claim of one all knowing consciousness that already knows everything about itself including its whole history but then having to experience the life of every human as if it completely starts over ignorant of itself each time just to "grow" creates a paradox, that means you cannot have an unknown future if your present self knows the past (for if you know your past then you cannot be surprised nor can you learn by forgetting your memories which the birthing of the universe demonstrates you never did nor can the veil of separation be both non existent for you to have any real doubt yet also exist in such a way to mask your already acquired knowledge from you at the same time). therefore the theory defeats itself and is just a made up childrens story that begins with adulthood and ends with childhood.

As the title implies, this will be over the happenstance of the development of ancient language. Be warned, this topic is not readily accessible and has difficult to process concepts.

Currently, a few theories stand out at needing recognition, the 'bow wow' theory: humans tried to imitate animal sounds in the creation of language, and 'emergence': the functionality became self representative. It is my understanding that likely the actual occurrence is some position between the two. Emergence does not occur in a vacuum, especially in such a complicated circumstance as ancient humanity had, and imitation does not create functionality in nearly as much of a clear and effective manner as presence within mechanisms. This leads to my personal theory of "naturalization".

Naturalization implies that language, rather than being a product of some vague and nebulous abstract mechanical singularity, is a product of natural physiological responses to self expressed stimuli becoming normalized and standardized. Similar to purring, each of these vocalizations have an intrinsic effect on the physiology, I believe this is the reason for the differences in language structures within the variety of human ethnos. On the topic of origins, I think it would be difficult to say whether origin of animal mimicry is the absolute source of human vocalization, regardless, it may be possible as animals have long since used it as a warning signal to other creatures. Whether or not early humans understood the reasons for such vocalizations is another issue in potential origin influences on ancient or modern language, but is not the point of this discussion. As these physiological correlations became more standardized, hedonistic stimulus seeking likely became the early driving force of development, combining multiple forms of vocalizations to study and create implicative meanings that would eventually give rise to early standardized language over simple vocalizations.

Feel free to critique,
FLM

Implementation of new theoretical element or substance and its potential uses in roblox.

This will be somewhat of a diatribe and thesis on a matter that has been taking a considerable amount of my thought as of late.

We know that most occurrences are happenstantial representations of the context wherein, in fact, it may be easier to simply say that context is and has its due representation. We see this in pretty much all of modern and ancient scientific theory, whether it dabble into theology, or is purely spiritual in emphatic nature. In this regard, one of the most curious concepts is the vapidity of the "big bang theory". There is a lot of contextualized commentary that it 'likely' occurred, or even that it has observable traits, but never much about how. I'd like to take this moment of your time dear reader to supply and perhaps litigate through and for the most devious component of modern science, "metaphysics"; generally, metaphysics is a conceptual and rhetorical field based on the discussion of relations drawn or fostered by abstractions. In this fairly scientific regard I do hope you'll bear with me as I do my best to discuss some normally overlooked but fairly elementary fundamentals.

G

Me and my team are creating and theorising new fictional element

Does objective morality exist, or do humans entirely invent right and wrong?

With the merit of substance within expression, can art ever truly be so vapid or lacking in interpretation to perception that it becomes some form of malaise or hindrance through its portrayal or expression?

I’m not very knowledgeable in science but I am curious on this.

In 2004, there was a mysterious sighting of an object that was able to move very fast, randomly (able to travel 60 miles in seconds). Other than the fact there was an object that was able to move very fast, which was captured on radar, there is not much confirmed information as to what exactly it is.
Eyewitnesses reported it being shaped like a tic tac, about the size of a Boeing 737, able to mirror other aerial objects, and that it disappeared.

Additional Info:
https://youtu.be/ygB4EZ7ggig?si=Q9UOPqEDqzKjaa8W

My inquiry is: What exactly could allow an object to perform these actions?
Also sorry if the context is too UAP/UFO based.

It is theory speaking about people creating and playing social roles just as "server leader", "car mechanic" and go on.
Because of that people are creating own vision of world that is either forced on self or others.
Expecting people to play a certain role to became accepted by others.
By "entering into role" people aren't showing self but the type of characteristics that are being accepted under the role. It works even in dating world and so for that reason people doesn't love a person but rather the role that person is playing.. as example a "doomer" or "femboy".
This is also a main reason why most of relationships are falling off since that role cannot be played all the time by us. And so our true self is showing on and the people that "felt in love with us" aren't really interested in us but in the role we have played.

What about you? Would you prefer to be rejected by majority but be accepted truly by 2 people or do you prefer to live in ilusion of be accepted by everyone?

Dramaturgy, can be defined as a perspective where the awareness and consideration of influences becomes so prevalent within a developing society that the consideration of activity and integrated productivity become too intertwined with the functionality of a sustained self to be properly interpolated without presumption.

I will be placing my laughable or personally enjoyed art projects here.

I may be petty, but I figure it warrants an acknowledgement.

Time travel, a currently high sci-fi concept, is a curious talk and balance between uncriticized dreams and the horrors of 'god-like technology and power'. While I will be open to discussion, my goal is to sagely and thoroughly leave little room for it within the duration of the explanation and expose on the topic. Further questions that are not conceptually solvable within the ramifications and structure explained will be addressed once asked within the thread, however I will not oblige a lack of conceptual progression to understand the idiosyncrasies of the topic.

"Time Travel is Murder": Very little is discussed about this specific issue when it comes to the matter of dallying with life and it's effects within reality. Often times relegated to a sidenote of "causality"/"the butterfly effect", time travel is inherently a matter of deleting a program mid computation while knowing a previous state to superimpose a new one. Setting aside the notions of 'originality and causality', any and all successes of time travel are inherently a method of poisoning the well for future generations. At the juncture where technology is inherently so incredible that one can hold power over a very dimension of perception such as time, one must recognize that any energy or matter lost from that state in the universe holds much more sway over life than what a simple peasant farmer destined to die alone would from the medieval era.

"Poisoning the Well": When such technology occurs, we must consider the ramifications of being able to interact with the very dimension of time, often referred to as "4-D" for it's 1 dimensional representation with 3 dimensionality in substance, like collapsing a wave function, it seems likely that the ability to interfere with such a substance of reality and perception is likely to acknowledge the fundamental substance of it's structure first. Further changes become cemented as a byproduct, having potential leave the immediate causal trajectory for...?

When does social understanding, infrastructure, or control become depotism.

Is there a middle ground for reasonable debate?