Tripoli Road Repairs and Hezbollah Disarmament Debate

Resumo

In r/Lebanon, members discuss Tripoli receiving new road asphalt for the first time in generations and consider how violence in Syria may affect US pressure for rapid Hezbollah disarmament. The discussion highlights risks of forced disarmament, including sectarian conflict, and expresses concern for civilians and Druze communities in Suwayda.

For the first time since the collapse of the Ottoman empire, Tripoli is getting new road asphalt

Post Author: /u/sad_trabulsyy
Content Warning: None
Tripoli Road Repairs and Hezbollah Disarmament Debate

Opinion: Events in Syria will likely change the US eagerness for a swift disarmament of Hezbollah.

First of all, I don't want to comment specifically on what happened in Syria, but I do need to say this. I hope all civilians in Syria are safe, and my heart goes out to the Druze civilians in Suwayda, who are currently in a very difficult position because of the attacks against them. And I hope for all civilians, and my Druze brothers specifically, to be safe and sound always.

The idea, basically, of what Tom Barak said about encouraging the Syrian president to create this unified, centralized country, in which the idea is to monopolize arms only to the state and disarm all nonstate actors, is taking place, and we see the dangers of such a strategy when you try to disarm by force.

Obviously, the Syrian situation is very different, and the conduct of the Syrian army is basically a ragtag group of militias that do not live up to the standards of an army, so they cannot be compared to the conduct and professionalism of the LAF, disregarding actual military capabilities. So the Syrian army is basically a collection of militias. Some of them are extremists. But we can somewhat put this under the very general "title" of disarming non-state armed groups. Where the Syrian nominal army tried to disarm the Druze by force.

But regardless, this episode shows us that the US would probably revise their eagerness to disarm Hezbollah quickly, swiftly, and decisively, because you can see when you try to disarm a group through force and coercion, the result would be sectarian battles and sectarian blood, and it would possibly change what could have been a more streamlined operation into something very messy and one that would endanger the entirety of the Lebanese state.

So I think for now, even the US would try to scale back its demands for the forceful disarmament of Hezbollah and would likely favor Aoun's approach of dialogue. In my personal opinion, Aoun's approach to dialogue is not going to go anywhere, and therefore, Hezbollah will not be disarmed anytime soon because dialogue won't solve shit. But Aoun is prob...
Post Author: /u/Standard_Ad7704
Content Warning: None

As últimas novidades de r/Lebanon

Lebanon Politics: Calls for Progress on Hezbollah

In r/Lebanon, this announcement highlights concerns about a year of stalled government progress on Hezbollah and the country’s frozen political situation. It also raises questions …