IBAF Allegations Raise Server Integrity Questions
Summary
The International Dito Games Community announcement outlines allegations that the IBAF server has been used as a tool for vendetta and account misuse. It highlights a suspicious account password, claims that the password should not be changed, and raises questions about possible coercion and server integrity. This matters because it affects trust and safety across the community.
IBAF is a criminal enterprise. It has time and again been used as a tool for personal vendetta and revenge. An account owned by EXIM, Havertz78 which was presumably banned as of yesterday had 48 points with 0 bases. Xeon, owner of the IBAF server then says it is in use and he saw it in use. Later it ends up that the password is Xeon@*. Xeon says it's about a seller in IBAF server, the IBAF server does not show any buyer or any individual or any mention of the account Havertz78. Xeon tells Exim not to change the password, settle things with him so that he mentions the seller. In what position is Xeon in to blackmail and hide the truth from the true owner? How and why does Xeon think he can lie about an account being in use? Why is the account password Xeon@? Why is he saying the password shouldn't be changed? Does this really reflect the integrity of the IBAF server?
