Is Instigating in Debates Just Ragebait? | FriendZone
- Share this discussion
- Copy link
- Share on X (Twitter)
Summary
The FriendZone | Make Friends ⋅ Fun Chill Active Chat ⋅ VC Social Gaming ⋅ Memes ⋅ Nitro Emojis ⋅ Anime community is diving into the psychology of online arguments. This announcement explores whether instigating in debates is a form of manipulation or simple ragebait. Members share their perspectives on handling heated 1v20 scenarios and the importance of maintaining healthy discourse in a social environment.
So
There has been times on Debates or Anywhere in particular that there would be two people talking about this or that regards of what topic is about (Mostly anything)
And there would be people around the circle or in the table listening to the debate
And the people that usually interrupts the debates would tend to instigate the debate in order to provoke conflict or manipulating the situation to get others upset
And for some reason
In Hot Takes
Theres gonna be lots of Ragebaiting and Biases time after time
Like 1v20s you against everybody that would disagree in arguments
For some reason you wish you have that morality by your side but it only depends on the topic
(Instigating atp is just Ragebaiting TO ME tho)
Whats yall take?
Yes
Thats true
Many loves it
Idk why
🤣🤣
Time to find popcorn
are you rizzing her
Let them try
We will enjoy our life
Nobody is rizzing
sure
charles is getting old, he has to rizz someone up
yea it’s bs but like everyone said iTs DiScOrD
🤣🤣
see? hes trying it again
is the "lol" strategy
Yea I kinda agree, whenever it gets kinda heated I just feel it's better to not always be so firm on a side since at times both sides got good points (not always but yh)
wait for it
Nah better to just explode than wait
Yup, it's like the purpose for them is to ragebait and spill some vulgarity lol...
They could just be sharing their opinions ig. It depends on the person's reason, some people can perceive even an opinion as ragebait even when the person who said it didn't have intentions of that
i mean if ur posting a hot take then u should have every point to defend ur take(only if u firmly believe in it)..even if someone's trying to ragebait then just give them reply in their own way..
whats even the point of hot take if everyone is just agreeing
Idk bro like its a lot of biases when it comes to 1v20s and ive been seeing that so much lately
Yet again, based off of tone and facial expressions, it can most definitely be ragebait. No matter if the fact is true or not.
Why do you take it as 1v20 🤷♂️ it just 20 people disagree they have opinions na 🙆♂️
How are you seeing facial expressions gang 🥀🥀🙆♂️
just stick to ur point..if someone's whole purpose is ragebaiting then they wont last long..
Oh we know ragebaiting dont last long its just sad for them to talk atp
nah trust me theres people gonna be yapping and a whole group of the same biases be pulling up on u like this
I mean look if someone is giving the vibe of that ignoring him is best or just try to defuse it. Being stuck to one point is like being biased
The same way everyone else would, other than that, I’m talking about obviously rude remarks, like a smirk, or a instigating look
Emoji?
usually i put ignore most of the time on trolls like bro last week some person had to make 9 accs just to do the same shit ragebaiting and trolling and making false accusations on people and actually this person got one person banned for making false statements to him
That's crazy
You can even do that
yeah this person bypass joining in the server by using a vpn
its insane
Fahhh
I can’t describe it any better
Hmm so ignore them I guess nothing to do as it's a public post yea 🤷♂️
?
I mean ignore the baiters
yeah pretty much
No reaction to them is the w
I can totally see it now, thanks
welcome 🤗
So if it's not true. You would still call it ragebait. I guess having a different opinion have lost its freedom
Just grow up dude....
If you can't take criticism go offline