Debating Ethics: The Abortion Discussion at FriendZone
Summary
The FriendZone | Make Friends & Chat ⋅ Active Social Fun ⋅ Chill ⋅ VC server is hosting a deep-dive discussion regarding the ethics and biological definitions of abortion. This announcement outlines a logical argument concerning human rights and the status of an unborn child. It serves as a focal point for community members to engage in complex moral debates and exchange perspectives on sensitive social issues within a structured environment.
the reason i bring up the slavery thing is because you were talking about how your morality should follow the law
If abortion was legal… all of them would be dead
Regardless
You’re just making the choice for them
That doesn’t mean it was right was my point
Just because the law says it’s legal, doesn’t mean it is legally okay
Maybe not morally on the same level but if your solution is that anyone should be able to kill their unwanted child is crazy
So many unwanted children alive today that are happy they are not dead
Being unwanted should not be a death sentence
We don’t get to decide if they live or die
I am pro human rights
By killing the child??
This is only if you know it will suffer and die
Are you saying all unwanted children will just die on the streets??
And don’t deserve life?
You are saying they will all just die??
😭😭😭
Alright bro
I think I’ve heard enough of this
I think you know this is not true but you are now grasping so you can maybe try to make an attempt at an argument
There are unwanted children today that are thriving also
Yes I have
The argument is that KILLING SOMEONE is not a viable alternative to prevent suffering
That is literally what Thanos tried to do bro and he’s a fictional supervillain 😭😭
And your assumption here to justify this is “they are going to end up dead on the streets or in dumpsters anyway”
Like ????
You know you can’t say that as a general truth for unwanted children but you say it anyway
Don’t say Im twisting your words either because its literally what you said bro
You can not say that for every unwanted child and even if there were some that it happened to, you do not get to kill the child yourself
My argument is that a life of suffering is not a justification to kill the one that leads that life
There is no way you can be against that bruh
The idea that you’re okay with killing someone just so you can prevent them from possibly living a life of suffering is crazy
Because 1. that suffering isn’t even guaranteed, you are making a permanent decision on somebody’s LIFE based on a feeling about the future you aren’t even sure of yourself
and 2. even if that person did lead a life of suffering, does not mean you have the right to KILL him/her before that suffering begins
Yeah having disabilities is not a valid reason to deprive someone from the right to life bro
I personally believe in human rights for all humans including the disabled
What is your dog question
Can you restate it
Probably euthanized but your analogy for how this relates to a baby is so flawed 😭
You are comparing an embryo to a sick dog that will die shortly anyway
It’s not the same thing at all because you are comparing poverty to a terminal illness 😂
A better comparison would be if you saw a homeless dog fending for itself on the street. Does that give you the right to kill it?
Answer is no
Suppose the child is healthy but will be poor
Can you kill the child?
(no, you can’t)
That’s an easy answer
Im explaining to you why your analogy fails
You were comparing a terminally ill dog with a human being that may grow up in poverty
Wdym
