Is Violence Always the Answer? | FriendZone Debate
Summary
The FriendZone | Make Friends ⋅ Fun Chill Active Chat ⋅ VC Social Gaming ⋅ Memes ⋅ Nitro Emojis ⋅ Anime community recently held a thought-provoking debate on whether physical conflict is ever justified. Members explored the thin line between survival-based violence and the importance of communication, touching on topics like war, historical duels, and non-violent intimidation. This discussion highlights the diverse perspectives found within our active chat, proving that even heavy topics can fos...
Sometimes causing physical pain to another person isnt usually justified unless there are reasonable anwsers to why this perosn may be either good or bad
However
Physical conflict typically wont get anywhere most of the time
But rather keeps the pain going
fighting is necassary for survival. thats my opinion
for survival in a way yeah? but not always the case sometimes its good to talk things out instead of creating conflict
yes i agree, it should be used as a last resort
😐
Yes, violence is always the answer
When two sides clash, the only way to see which one will survive is through fight
It also works with discussions too
We should bring back duels to settle arguments
Sometimes yah
dang yall like to live old school violence i see
explain?
Well when we see wars we see the cause of them if the war is about protecting your country than it's definitely justified
wars as of today shouldnt even exist anymore as were already living through struggles of life in this cruel world thats been happening like why cause more pain and suffering
Look doesn't matter how much the world progresses there will be war's and it will exist no matter what we do bc humans can't be pleased with what they have
Do you support wars entirely?
Absolutely no there has to be a valid reason or need attacking a country that didn't harm you is not acceptable
Old is often good
One slap is better than repeating myself 
😐
old school on good things = classic
power is lots of corruption
Not really there is many types of power that doesn't involve violence or corruption
yeah true
why u need to fight when u can hold the eye contact bro
eye contact Ha
i mean by looking at someone in the eyes it gives them kinda chills or a sense of nerves what I'm trying to say is maybe u can maintain the defense move n hold someone in place til the emotion off
If it's not used as a last resort then no, that's literally not using critical thinking and is acting stupid
Also one side of a group arguing could literally be weaker by strength, if they're trying to speak with reasoning and the other side goes to punch them then it just shows who can't handle genuine ways of talking it out
Nope....
Let love win in everything
If someone hurts you or try to kill you....
Kiss them on the forehead then hug them 🤓
No
Its not the answer
But if someone threw bottles at me
I would defended my self
Self defense yes
